Billy Graham says it best......

http://myhopewithbillygraham.org/programs/the-cross/

THE UNRAVELING OF THE SOUL

August 2011 THE UNRAVELING OF THE SOUL

From time immemorial, the three great enemies of the soul have been “the world, the flesh and the devil” and they work in concert. The devil is a master at using our fleshly desires to entice us into a love for the world and thus separate us from God (1 John 2.15-17). In The Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis uses an imaginary dialog between an old, experienced demon and a young tempter to shed helpful light on some of the devil’s schemes. Read slowly and ponder below, and see if you can identify any that are at work in your life:

The long, dull monotonous years of middle-aged prosperity or middle-aged adversity are excellent campaigning weather. You see, it is so hard for these creatures to persevere. The routine of adversity, the gradual decay of youthful loves and youthful hopes, the quiet despair (hardly felt as pain) of ever overcoming the chronic temptations with which we have again and again defeated them, the drabness which we create in their lives and the inarticulate resentment with which we teach them to respond to it—all this provides admirable opportunities of wearing out a soul by attrition. If, on the other hand, the middle years prove prosperous, our position is even stronger. Prosperity knits a man to the World. He feels that he is “finding his place in it,” while really it is finding its place in him. His increasing reputation, his widening circle of acquaintances, his sense of importance, the growing pressure of absorbing and agreeable work, build up in him a sense of being really at home in earth which is just what we want. You will notice that the young are generally less unwilling to die than the middle-aged and the old. The truth is that the Enemy, having oddly destined these mere animals to life in His own eternal world, has guarded them pretty effectively from the danger of feeling at home anywhere else. That is why we must often wish long life to our patients; seventy years is not a day too much for the difficult task of unraveling their souls from Heaven and building up a firm attachment to the earth. While they are young we find them always shooting off at a tangent. Even if we contrive to keep them ignorant of explicit religion, the incalculable winds of fantasy and music and poetry—the mere face of a girl, the song of a bird, or the sight of a horizon—are always blowing our whole structure away. They will not apply themselves steadily to worldly advancement, prudent connections, and the policy of safety first. So inveterate is their appetite for Heaven that our best method at this stage, of attaching them to earth is to make them believe that earth can be turned into Heaven at some future date by politics or eugenics or “science” or psychology, or what not. Real worldliness is a work of time—assisted of course by pride—for we teach them to describe the creeping death as good sense or Maturity or Experience.1

As one of the old Puritans said, “The devil is a master fisherman: he baits the hook according to the appetite of the fish.” If none of the above are at work in you, what else might there be that is unraveling your soul from God and knitting it to something (or someone) of the world? Ask the Holy Spirit to show you. Do not love the world or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in them. For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world. The world and its desires pass away, but whoever does the will of God lives forever. 1 John 2:15-17 (NIV)

Is the Devil Real?

A good article from the C. S. Lewis Institute.......

A FIGMENT OF THE IMAGINATION?

o you believe the devil is real or just a figment of the imagination? According to pollster George Barna, “the notion that Satan, or the Devil, is a real being who can influence people’s lives is regarded as hogwash by most Americans. Only one quarter (27%) strongly believe that Satan  is real, while the majority argues that he is merely a symbol of evil.” Were C.S. Lewis alive today, he would regard our disbelief in the devil with dismay. “There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.” Lewis’s understanding of the devil was shaped by Holy Scripture. There we see that Satan deceived and seduced Eve to disobey God (Gen. 3), inflicted great harm upon Job and his family (Job 1-2), tempted Jesus (Mt. 4), and later inspired Judas to betray him. Knowing all of this, Peter urges believers to “…be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a lion seeking someone to devour. But resist him, firm in your faith…” (1 Pe. 5:8- 9). And, Paul urges us to “put on the full armor of God so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil, for our struggle is not against flesh and blood…”(Eph. 6:11). “No reference to the Devil or devils is included in any Christian Creeds, and it is quite possible to be a Christian without believing in them. I do believe such beings exist, but that is my own affair. Supposing there to be such beings, the degree to which humans were conscious of their presence would presumably vary very much. I mean, the more a man was in the Devil’s power, the less he would be aware of it, on the principle that a man is still fairly sober as long as he knows he’s drunk. It is the people who are fully awake and trying hard to be good who would be most aware of the Devil.” Do you believe the devil is real? Are you fully awake to his schemes? Do you know how to resist his attacks? We could all benefit from more awareness of our enemy. Indeed, our spiritual health depends on it. C.S. Lewis wrote The Screwtape Letters as a practical tool to help believers recognize and resist the devil’s schemes and attacks. Another excellent resource is Powers of Darkness, by Professor Clinton Arnold (InterVarsity Press), which provides a sound biblical theology that is very helpful. Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand  firm against the schemes of the devil. EPHESIANS 6:11 (NASB)

Pursuing True Spirituality

By Michael Youssef, Ph.D.

The true spirituality that heals us is rooted in the fact that God is transcendent. He stands outside and apart from His creation. God is holy and just, and He is sovereign over all that He has created. He is the omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent One who loves us unconditionally and who desires fellowship with all humankind. But He relates to us on His terms, not on ours.

Therefore, we experience true spirituality only through God’s Spirit, who indwells a person as he or she responds in faith to Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord. This is the exact opposite of shadow spirituality, which contends that the “god within” merely needs to be awakened and coaxed into actualizing activities. When the superficial, feel-good emotions are stripped away, though, one quickly realizes that New Age thinking is not new at all. It is the oldest of all philosophies, dating back to the Garden of Eden, where the first man and woman thought they could be like God. Indeed, they sought to be God.

True spirituality shows us the tragic consequences of this path. All of us are born with a missing dimension caused by the sin of wanting to live independently of God. This sin separates us from Him. The only way to fill that void is through repentance of sin, faith in Jesus Christ, and the indwelling power of God’s Spirit. This is the spirituality that makes us whole.

It is only when God’s Spirit opens our blind spiritual eyes that we truly begin to understand ourselves and recognize our own darkness and moral corruption—in other words, our sinfulness. True spirituality helps us recognize that our desperate inner longing is not a need for independence, but rather a consuming need for dependence—dependence on the Savior.

Biblical spirituality leads us to know the light of the world, Jesus Christ, and makes it possible for us to experience wholeness of body, mind, and spirit in becoming like Him. This healing comes only as the Holy Spirit of God is invited to do His ongoing work of transformation in our lives. We are made whole when we reflect the “character-likeness” of Jesus Christ.

Will you ask the Lord to reveal to you the true answer to your inner longing, and to help you understand that your heart is made whole the moment you receive Jesus as the Savior of your soul? Will you ask God to help you walk in the light of His Son through all of life’s challenges that you are facing?

Prayer: Lord, because of Your great love for me, You made me alive in Christ even when I was dead in my sin (Ephesians 2:5). Father, thank You for sending the light of the world, Jesus. I pray in His name. Amen.


“I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life” (John 8:12).

http://www.leadingtheway.org/web/guest/read/my-devotional

http://www.leadingtheway.org/web/guest/read/my-devotional

Advice for Dealing with Temptation

The following was posted by Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Church some time ago.  I've changed a few things and reposted it here.

September 11th, was the anniversary of the Terrorist attacks in the United States and Benghazi, Libya. I imagine you will long remember what you were doing on September 11th when you heard the news. In John 10:10. Jesus said, “The thief only comes to steal and kill and destroy. I have come that they may have life and have it to the full.”  

Most people do not need to be convinced of the reality of evil and its awful dehumanizing effects that would lead people to contemplate and commit such evil and destructive acts. Only the Christian explanation of ‘demonic possession’ can explain such perverted evil perpetrated by human beings.

One of Satan's most common scriptural names is the devil, from diabolos, which means accuser or slanderer and we meet him face to face in our gospel reading. Among the many other names given him are: the ruler of this world (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11), the god of this world (2 Corinthians 4:4), the ancient serpent, called the devil, Satan who leads the whole world astray (Revelation 12:9), Abaddon in Hebrew and Apollyon in Greek, both of which mean “destroyer” (Revelation 9:11), and in our reading today - the tempter (Matthew 4:3;  1 Thess. 3:5).  He is all of these, all the time, slandering, accusing, tempting, destroying, just as much today here as on September 11, 2001 as in New York.

I wonder if you felt his tempting power that day, and everyday with the news in the Middle East - the temptation to accuse God for allowing such a crime, the temptation to accuse religious minorities of being responsible, the temptation to want to retaliate. In the passage before us today, Matthew has two primary purposes in presenting Jesus’ temptations in the wilderness. First, to demonstrate, at the beginning of his mission, Jesus’ victory over Satan, the only other great ruler and dominion in the universe.  Second, to demonstrate how we too can overcome temptation and Satan’s attempts to destroy us. As we shall see Jesus relied on one thing and one thing only to defeat Satan, His absolute submission to the Will of God revealed in the Word of God. This momentous encounter, may be divided into three parts: We see here the purpose of temptation, the nature of temptation and the means of victory over temptation.

1. The Purpose of Temptation (Matthew 4:1-2)

“Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil. After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry.” (Matthew 4:1–2)

1.1 Temptation came directly after blessing

Jesus has just been baptized. God the Father had declared, “This is my son in whom I am well pleased!” What a spiritual high. You will discover that testing will often come on the heels of a spiritual high point in your life.

1.2 Temptation came with physical weakness

Jesus had not eaten in 40 days. Temptations often come when we are a weakened state physically or emotionally, when we are exhausted and emotionally spent. In a survey on temptation among readers of the Discipleship Journal, the respondents noted temptations were most potent when they had neglected their time with God (81%) and when they were physically tired (57%)

1.3 Temptation came when Jesus was alone

We are most susceptible to temptation when we are alone. That is why friends are so important - why fellowship on a weekly basis in church or in a small group is so essential. The same Discipleship Journal survey found that 84% of respondents said they overcame temptation by prayer, 76% said by avoiding compromising situations, 66% said Bible study helped them and 52% said being accountable to someone helped them. That’s quite an advert for small groups bible study, prayer and fellowship. What Satan intended to lead the Son into sin and disobedience, the Father used to demonstrate the Son’s holiness and worthiness.  That is God’s plan for all of His children. Christians cannot be tempted in a way that God cannot use for their good and His glory.

James even tells us to, “consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, when you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance. Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.” (James 1:2–4).

That is God’s plan and purpose—to use Satan's temptations as a means of testing and strengthening our faith in Him and of our growing stronger in righteousness. God allows testings in our lives in order that our spiritual “muscles” get exercise and grow stronger. Whether the testing is by God’s initiative or is sent by Satan, God will always use it to produce good in us when we meet the test in His power. 

It is God’s great desire to turn into victory what Satan intends for failure, to strengthen us at the very point where the adversary wants to find us weak. The Purpose of Temptation - testing.

2. The Nature of Temptation (Matthew 4:3-10)
In each of these temptations we hear the devil speak and Jesus answer. Lets view them one at a time.

2.1 The temptation to do it yourself  (Matthew 4:3-4)
The Devil Speaks: “If You are the Son of God, tell this stone to become bread.” (4:3). Satan is not casting doubt on whether Jesus is the Son of God.  He literally says “since you are the Son of God.”  The first temptation would be no temptation at all if Jesus were not the Son of God. His basic strategy is to make us believe that God can’t be trusted. You could almost sense the innocence in the devil’s suggestion – “just turn these stones into bread” – what’s the big deal? You the Son of God – just do it!  Jesus had been without food for nearly six weeks. This temptation was therefore very real. John Piper says that sin …"gets its power by persuading me to believe that I will be more happy if I follow it. The power of all temptation is the prospect that it will make me happier."  The Devil speaks. Jesus Answers: “It is written, ‘People do not live on bread alone.’” (Matthew 4:4). Notice Jesus uses the same phrase in each of his answers, “it is written.” He did not allow the situation or the circumstances or even the enemy to dictate the truth.

The answers to all three temptations comes right out of Deuteronomy, the story of God’s pilgrim people delivered from slavery. Jesus was saying, “I will not take matters into my own hands. I will trust my Father and his word.” We will never be tempted to turn stones into bread because the impossible does not tempt us. Instead, the Devil’s ploy is to make us believe that if we want something done we need to do it ourselves – not trust in God. His way, his purposes, his timing. I am regularly tempted to go outside the confines of God’s will to satisfy my personal needs or desires - and all it takes is a credit card. The temptation to do it yourself answered by a reliance on God’s Word.

2.2 The temptation that seeing is believing (Matthew 4:5-7)Next Satan leads Jesus to the highest point of the Temple and quotes from Psalm 91: “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down from here. For it is written: “’He will command his angels concerning you to guard you carefully; they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’” (Matthew 4:5-7)

For Jesus to have followed Satan's suggestion would have been, in the eyes of many Jews, sure proof he was the Messiah. Sensationalism is always appealing, and many are willing to believe almost anyone or anything as long as the claims are accompanied by the supernatural.  As is so often the case, the divine promise Satan quotes is preceded by a divine command which he conveniently leaves out.

“If you make the Most High your dwelling—even the Lord, who is my refuge— then no harm will befall you, no disaster will come near your tent.  For he will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways;  they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.” (Psalm 91:1-2, 9-12)

Notice the conditional clause? "If... then..."  To ignore the divine command in order to appropriate the divine promise is presumption not faith, it is rebellion not obedience. We cannot separate the means from the motive. Dramatic signs, even when they are from God, do not produce faith; they only strengthen the faith of those who already believe. Jesus’ miracles merely hardened the opposition of His enemies to the point where He declared that “an evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign” (Matt. 12:39).  Jesus Himself was the greatest sign ever given by, yet, as Isaiah had predicted hundreds of years before, He “was despised and forsaken” (Isaiah 53:3; Luke 18:31–33). Demanding sensational proof is not evidence of faith but of doubt. To long for the visible sign, the big miracle, the dramatic proof is nothing but unbelief. Jesus would have no part in Satan’s stunt. “It is also written” he replied, “Do not put the Lord your God to the test.” (Matthew 4:7)

Jesus refused for at least two reasons. First, any miracle is inevitably frustrated by the law of diminishing returns. People are never satisfied. They always want one more sign, one more miracle, one more show. To have maintained His influence over the people by the use of miracles, Jesus would have had to produce greater and greater sensations. His followers would only have been lovers of sensation, not lovers of God. Second, and more significant, no matter how noble and important we may think our reasons are, to test God is to doubt God. And to doubt God is not to trust Him, and not to trust Him is sin. That, of course, is what Satan wanted Jesus to do.  Had Jesus put His Father to such a test, He would have perverted the divine plan of redemption—the very purpose for which He had come. Jesus refused this shortcut.

There are many subtle ways that we can put God to the test. We may not jump from the top of the church – but we may be tempted to think that God is only present when we see certain spiritual gifts used, or particular musical instruments are played, or a particular person is involved. When we expect a word of knowledge rather than study God’s word we test God. When we would rather read a newspaper or novel than memorise the Scriptures, we test God. When we think that occasional attendance and not dedicated service will keep us on the right path - we test God. When we take risks with clear moral absolutes like truth telling and honesty, we test God.  Why then are we so surprised when we fall.  The temptation to do it yourself . The temptation that seeing is believing. 

2.3 The temptation to take the easy way (Matthew 4:8-10)The Devil Speaks.   “The devil led him up to a very high mountain and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world and their splendour. “All this I will give you” he said, “if you bow down and worship me.” (Matthew 4:8-10)

The devil was not lying when he promises Jesus, “this has been given to me, and I give it to anyone I want to.” (Luke 4:6).
The devil was offering Jesus a kingdom but without the cross. Why go to all the trouble and pain to win the world when it can be yours for free. No suffering, No struggle, No pain. Just switch allegiance and join my team. But a crown without the cross would mean no forgiveness for our sins. So Jesus Answers: “”Away from me Satan, for it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.’” (Matthew 4:10). We do not have to look for to see the application. We are taught to avoid pain, to take the easy way, the path of least resistance. Avoid sacrifice. Charity begins at home. Why put up with the same partner? The only absolute is my right to personal freedom and affluence.

Jesus contradicts this when he answers Satan: “It is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God and serve him only…’ - period, unconditionally, unreservedly, irrespective of the consequences, without any incentive other than that we are obedient to his perfect will. In one sense these temptations Jesus faced were unique and personal to Jesus. As we shall see, Satan knows our weaknesses and where we too are vulnerable.

The temptation to do it yourself. The temptation that seeing is believing. The temptation to take the easy way. Each defeated by the Word of God. The purpose of temptation - testing; The nature of temptation - personal.

3. The Victory over Temptation (4:11)

“Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him” (Matthew 4:11).

In Luke’s account he adds, Satan, “…left him until an opportune time.” (Luke 4:13) When it says that the Devil “left him” the Greek is much more emphatic. It means he “stood off.” This battle was over but Satan had not given up. Margaret Thatcher once said, “You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it.”  You may withstand Satan today but remember the battle is not over - he lies in wait for another opportune moment. When you are weak – expect a major assault. When you resist – be ready for a different approach. When he leaves – count on another attack.

Rick Warren suggests three simple steps to overcome temptation.

1. Refuse to be intimidated

The Lord gives all of His children the power to resist Satan. “Resist the devil,” James assures us, “and he will flee from you” (James 4:7). As he did with Jesus, Satan will not stay away very long, but with every temptation God promises on his word, he “will provide a way of escape” (1 Corinthians 10:13).

For every temptation Satan leads us into, a way out is provided by the Father. Satan's temptations can become God’s testing.

Warren says “In one sense you can consider temptation a compliment. Satan does not have to tempt those who are already doing his will; they are already his. Temptation is a sign that Satan hates you, not a sign of weakness… Its not a sin to be tempted… Temptation only becomes a sin when you give in to it.” Refuse to be intimidated.

2. Recognise your vulnerability

We are all wired differently. There are certain situations that will make you more vulnerable than other people. These situations are unique to your weakness, and you need to identify them because if you don’t, Satan surely will. He knows exactly what trips you up.

1 Peter 5:8 in the Message says “Stay alert. The Devil is poised to pounce, and would like nothing better than to catch you napping.” (1 Peter 5:8). Ask yourself “When am I most tempted?” “What time of day?” In the morning? In the evening? Ask yourself “Where am I most tempted?” At work? At home? At a neighbours house? At a sports centre? In an airport? In a hotel? Ask “who is with me when I am most tempted?” Friends, co-workers? Strangers? When I am alone? Also ask “How do I usually feel when I am most tempted?”

It is probably when you are tired or lonely or bored. When you are depressed or under stress. When you have been hurt, or angry or worried. Perhaps after a big success or a spiritual high.

I don't know exactly when it is for me, but is usually when I am out of my routine and have spare time.  We have always heard that "an idle mind is the devil's workshop."  Identify your typical pattern of temptation and then avoid those situations as much as possible. When you are tempted, turn it into an opportunity for growth.

Ask yourself - “What Christ-like character quality can I develop by defeating this temptation?” Proverbs says,

Plan carefully what you do… Avoid evil and walk straight ahead. Don’t go one step off the right way… God’s people avoid evil ways, and they protect themselves by watching where they go.” (Proverbs 4:26-27, 16:17). Refuse to be intimidated. Recognise your vulnerability.

3. Request God’s help

“Heaven has a 24 hour emergency hot line. God wants you to ask him for assistance in overcoming temptation.”  God says, “Call on me in times of trouble. I will rescue you, and you will honour me.” (Psalm 50:15). Rick Warren calls this a “microwave prayer”

When temptation strikes, you don’t have time for a long conversational prayer. You simply need to cry out for help.

“The Bible guarantees that our cry for help will be heard because Jesus is sympathetic to our struggle. As we have seen, He faced the same temptations we do. That is why Hebrew 4:15 is such a comfort “understands our weaknesses, for he faced all the same temptations we do, yet he did not sin.” (Hebrews 4:15)

If God is waiting to help us defeat temptation, why don’t we turn to him more often? If we are honest we would admit that sometimes we don’t want to be helped! We want to give in to temptation even though we know it is wrong. At that moment we think we know what’s best for us more than God does.

At other times we are embarrassed to ask God for help because we keep giving in to the same temptation over and over. Warren reminds us that God never gets irritated, bored, or impatient when we keep coming back to him for help. The Bible says, “Let us have confidence, then, and approach God’s throne, where there is grace. There we will receive mercy and find grace to help us just when we need it.” (Hebrews 4:16). “God’s love is everlasting, and his patience endures for ever. If you have to cry out for God’s help two hundred times a day to defeat a particular temptation, he will still be eager to give mercy and grace, so come boldly. Ask him for the power to do the right thing and then expect him to provide it.”

Think about it. Jesus is the perfect sinless eternal Son of God, yet he chose to rely solely on the Scriptures to defeat Satan. What makes us think we can do it any other way? In your news sheet this morning is a Bible Reading Plan. I cannot think of anything more important to give you to help overcome temptation. Keep it carefully in your bible. It will help you to become diligent in reading God’s word. It will help strengthen you to withstand temptation as you learn to rely on God’s word to defeat the evil one.

The purpose of temptation - testing, the nature of temptation - personal, and the victory over temptation - certain.

“Temptations keep us dependent upon God. Just as the roots grow stronger when wind blows against a tree, so every time you stand up to a temptation you become more like Jesus. When you stumble - which you will - it is not fatal. If we were to summarise Jesus’ responses to the tempter, they were, in essence this: “I will trust my Father; I will not presume on His Word; I will rely on it. I will take my Father’s good gifts from His own hand, in His own way, and in His own time.” When you are tempted, like Jesus, instead of giving in or giving up, look to your Heavenly Father, expect him to help you, and remember the reward that is waiting for you.

“God blesses the people who patiently endure testing. Afterward they will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him.” (James 1:12). Lets pray.

The Great Sin

The Great Sin

.S. Lewis called it The Great Sin. Thomas Aquinas and Augustine called it the essence of all sin. It holds first place among the Seven Deadly Sins. The Bible suggests it was the cause of Lucifer’s fall from heaven. It also led to the fall of mankind. And all of us suffer from it in some measure, whether we know it or not. “According to Christian teachers, the essential vice, the utmost evil, is pride. Unchastity, anger, greed, drunkenness, and all that, are mere fleabites in comparison: it was through pride that the devil became the devil: pride leads to every other vice: it is the complete anti-God state of mind….it is pride which has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family since the world began.”1 Lewis tells us that pride is “essentially competitive—is competitive by its very nature—while the other vices are only competitive, so to speak, by accident. Pride gets no pleasure out of having something, only having more of it than the next man….it is the comparison that makes you proud: the pleasure of being above the rest.”2 Because of its nature, pride eats away at our relationships. “…pride always means enmity—it is enmity. And not only enmity between man and man but enmity to God….as long as you are proud you cannot know God. A proud man is always looking down on things and people: and as long as you are looking down you cannot see something that is above you.”3 The remedy for our pride is humility. “If anyone would like to acquire humility, I can, I think, tell him the first step. The first step is to realize one is proud. And a biggish step, too. At least nothing whatever can be done before it. If you think you are not conceited, it means you are very conceited, indeed.”4

Search me, O God, and know my heart, try me and know my anxious thoughts; and see if there be any hurtful way in me, and lead me in the everlasting way. Psalm 139.23-24

1 Mere Christianity, McMillan, p. 109, 110-111 2 ibid, 109, 110 3 ibid, 111 4 ibid, 114

The above is a repost from the C. S. Lewis Institute publication, Reflections, from May of 2003.

Letter from Special Forces about the 2nd Amendment

A Letter From The Special Forces Community Concerning The Second Amendment

Jan 29 2013 07:52 PM | HMFIC in Articles

asmdss special forces sof 2nd amendment assault weapon gun control constitution bill of rights

After a getting a "WARNO" previously, ASMDSS and Stolen Valor received this letter from members of the SOF community on their concerns for America and the Second Amendment. This letter was signed by over 1100 members of the SOF community, of which the names will not be published as this is Active and Retired members.

Whether you agree with it or not, it is well worth the read.

29 Jan 2013
Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned

We are current or former Army Reserve, National Guard, and active duty US Army Special Forces soldiers (Green Berets). We have all taken an oath to “…support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.…” The Constitution of the United States is without a doubt the single greatest document in the history of mankind, codifying the fundamental principle of governmental power and authority being derived from and granted through the consent of the governed. Our Constitution established a system of governance that preserves, protects, and holds sacrosanct the individual rights and primacy of the governed as well as providing for the explicit protection of the governed from governmental tyranny and/or oppression. We have witnessed the insidious and iniquitous effects of tyranny and oppression on people all over the world. We and our forebears have embodied and personified our organizational motto, De Oppresso Liber [To Free the Oppressed], for more than a half century as we have fought, shed blood, and died in the pursuit of freedom for the oppressed.

Like you, we are also loving and caring fathers and grandfathers. Like you, we have been stunned, horrified, and angered by the tragedies of Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Fort Hood, and Sandy Hook; and like you, we are searching for solutions to the problem of gun-related crimes in our society. Many of us are educators in our second careers and have a special interest to find a solution to this problem. However, unlike much of the current vox populi reactions to this tragedy, we offer a different perspective.
First, we need to set the record straight on a few things. The current debate is over so-called “assault weapons” and high capacity magazines. The terms “assault weapon” and “assault rifle” are often confused. According to Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joseph E. Olson, writing in the Stanford Law and Policy Review, “Prior to 1989, the term ‘assault weapon’ did not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term [underline added for emphasis], developed by anti-gun publicists to expand the category of assault rifles.”

The M4A1 carbine is a U.S. military service rifle – it is an assault rifle. The AR-15 is not an assault rifle. The “AR” in its name does not stand for “Assault Rifle” – it is the designation from the first two letters of the manufacturer’s name – ArmaLite Corporation. The AR-15 is designed so that it cosmetically looks like the M4A1 carbine assault rifle, but it is impossible to configure the AR-15 to be a fully automatic assault rifle. It is a single shot semi-automatic rifle that can fire between 45 and 60 rounds per minute depending on the skill of the operator. The M4A1 can fire up to 950 rounds per minute. In 1986, the federal government banned the import or manufacture of new fully automatic firearms for sale to civilians. Therefore, the sale of assault rifles are already banned or heavily restricted!

The second part of the current debate is over “high capacity magazines” capable of holding more than 10 rounds in the magazine. As experts in military weapons of all types, it is our considered opinion that reducing magazine capacity from 30 rounds to 10 rounds will only require an additional 6 -8 seconds to change two empty 10 round magazines with full magazines. Would an increase of 6 –8 seconds make any real difference to the outcome in a mass shooting incident? In our opinion it would not. Outlawing such “high capacity magazines” would, however, outlaw a class of firearms that are “in common use”. As such this would be in contravention to the opinion expressed by the U.S. Supreme Court recent decisions.

Moreover, when the Federal Assault Weapons Ban became law in 1994, manufacturers began retooling to produce firearms and magazines that were compliant. One of those ban-compliant firearms was the Hi-Point 995, which was sold with ten-round magazines. In 1999, five years into the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, the Columbine High School massacre occurred. One of the perpetrators, Eric Harris, was armed with a Hi-Point 995. Undeterred by the ten-round capacity of his magazines, Harris simply brought more of them: thirteen magazines would be found in the massacre’s aftermath. Harris fired 96 rounds before killing himself.

Now that we have those facts straight, in our opinion, it is too easy to conclude that the problem is guns and that the solution to the problem is more and stricter gun control laws. For politicians, it is politically expedient to take that position and pass more gun control laws and then claim to constituents that they have done the right thing in the interest of protecting our children. Who can argue with that? Of course we all want to find a solution. But, is the problem really guns? Would increasing gun regulation solve the problem? Did we outlaw cars to combat drunk driving?

What can we learn from experiences with this issue elsewhere? We cite the experience in Great Britain. Despite the absence of a “gun culture”, Great Britain, with one-fifth the population of the U.S., has experienced mass shootings that are eerily similar to those we have experienced in recent years. In 1987 a lone gunman killed 18 people in Hungerford. What followed was the Firearms Act of 1988 making registration mandatory and banning semi-automatic guns and pump-action shotguns. Despite this ban, on March 13, 1996 a disturbed 43-year old former scout leader, Thomas Hamilton, murdered 16 school children aged five and six and a teacher at a primary school in Dunblane, Scotland. Within a year and a half the Firearms Act was amended to ban all private ownership of hand guns. After both shootings there were amnesty periods resulting in the surrender of thousands of firearms and ammunition. Despite having the toughest gun control laws in the world, gun related crimes increased in 2003 by 35% over the previous year with firearms used in 9,974 recorded crimes in the preceding 12 months. Gun related homicides were up 32% over the same period. Overall, gun related crime had increased 65% since the Dunblane massacre and implementation of the toughest gun control laws in the developed world. In contrast, in 2009 (5 years after the Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired) total firearm related homicides in the U.S. declined by 9% from the 2005 high (Source: “FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Master File, Table 310, Murder Victims – Circumstances and Weapons Used or Cause of Death: 2000-2009”).

Are there unintended consequences to stricter gun control laws and the politically expedient path that we have started down?
In a recent op-ed piece in the San Francisco Chronicle, Brett Joshpe stated that “Gun advocates will be hard-pressed to explain why the average American citizen needs an assault weapon with a high-capacity magazine other than for recreational purposes.” We agree with Kevin D. Williamson (National Review Online, December 28, 2012): “The problem with this argument is that there is no legitimate exception to the Second Amendment right that excludes military-style weapons, because military-style weapons are precisely what the Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear.”

“The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny. Consider the words of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story”: ‘The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.’

The Second Amendment has been ruled to specifically extend to firearms “in common use” by the military by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v Miller (1939). In Printz v U.S. (1997) Justice Thomas wrote: “In Miller we determined that the Second Amendment did not guarantee a citizen’s right to possess a sawed-off shot gun because that weapon had not been shown to be “ordinary military equipment” that could “could contribute to the common defense”.

A citizen’s right to keep and bear arms for personal defense unconnected with service in a militia has been reaffirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court decision (District of Columbia, et al. v Heller, 2008). The Court Justice Scalia wrote in the majority opinion: “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.“. Justice Scalia went on to define a militia as “… comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense ….”

“The Anti-Federalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved.” he explained.

On September 13, 1994, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban went into effect. A Washington Post editorial published two days later was candid about the ban’s real purpose:“[N]o one should have any illusions about what was accomplished [by the ban]. Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime. The provision is mainly symbolic; its virtue will be if it turns out to be, as hoped, a stepping stone to broader gun control.”

In a challenge to the authority of the Federal government to require State and Local Law Enforcement to enforce Federal Law (Printz v United States) the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a decision in 1997. For the majority opinion Justice Scalia wrote: “…. this Court never has sanctioned explicitly a federal command to the States to promulgate and enforce laws and regulations When we were at last confronted squarely with a federal statute that unambiguously required the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program, our decision should have come as no surprise….. It is an essential attribute of the States’ retained sovereignty that they remain independent and autonomous within their proper sphere of authority.”

So why should non-gun owners, a majority of Americans, care about maintaining the 2nd Amendment right for citizens to bear arms of any kind?

The answer is “The Battle of Athens, TN”. The Cantrell family had controlled the economy and politics of McMinn County, Tennessee since the 1930s. Paul Cantrell had been Sheriff from 1936 -1940 and in 1942 was elected to the State Senate. His chief deputy, Paul Mansfield, was subsequently elected to two terms as Sheriff. In 1946 returning WWII veterans put up a popular candidate for Sheriff. On August 1 Sheriff Mansfield and 200 “deputies” stormed the post office polling place to take control of the ballot boxes wounding an objecting observer in the process. The veterans bearing military style weapons, laid siege to the Sheriff’s office demanding return of the ballot boxes for public counting of the votes as prescribed in Tennessee law. After exchange of gun fire and blowing open the locked doors, the veterans secured the ballot boxes thereby protecting the integrity of the election. And this is precisely why all Americans should be concerned about protecting all of our right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment!

Throughout history, disarming the populace has always preceded tyrants’ accession of power. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all disarmed their citizens prior to installing their murderous regimes. At the beginning of our own nation’s revolution, one of the first moves made by the British government was an attempt to disarm our citizens. When our Founding Fathers ensured that the 2nd Amendment was made a part of our Constitution, they were not just wasting ink. They were acting to ensure our present security was never forcibly endangered by tyrants, foreign or domestic.

If there is a staggering legal precedent to protect our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms and if stricter gun control laws are not likely to reduce gun related crime, why are we having this debate? Other than making us and our elected representatives feel better because we think that we are doing something to protect our children, these actions will have no effect and will only provide us with a false sense of security.

So, what do we believe will be effective? First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control problem; it is a complex sociological problem. No single course of action will solve the problem. Therefore, it is our recommendation that a series of diverse steps be undertaken, the implementation of which will require patience and diligence to realize an effect. These are as follows:

1.
First and foremost we support our Second Amendment right in that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.

2.
We support State and Local School Boards in their efforts to establish security protocols in whatever manner and form that they deem necessary and adequate. One of the great strengths of our Republic is that State and Local governments can be creative in solving problems. Things that work can be shared. Our point is that no one knows what will work and there is no one single solution, so let’s allow the State and Local governments with the input of the citizens to make the decisions. Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first district in North Texas to consider allowing some teachers to carry concealed guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do support their right to make this decision for themselves.

3.
We recommend that Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) laws be passed in every State. AOT is formerly known as Involuntary Outpatient Commitment (IOC) and allows the courts to order certain individuals with mental disorders to comply with treatment while living in the community. In each of the mass shooting incidents the perpetrator was mentally unstable. We also believe that people who have been adjudicated as incompetent should be simultaneously examined to determine whether they should be allowed the right to retain/purchase firearms.

4.
We support the return of firearm safety programs to schools along the lines of the successful “Eddie the Eagle” program, which can be taught in schools by Peace Officers or other trained professionals.

5.
Recent social psychology research clearly indicates that there is a direct relationship between gratuitously violent movies/video games and desensitization to real violence and increased aggressive behavior particularly in children and young adults (See Nicholas L. Carnagey, et al. 2007. “The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence” and the references therein. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:489-496). Therefore, we strongly recommend that gratuitous violence in movies and video games be discouraged. War and war-like behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video game producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman famously said “War is Hell!” Leave war to the Professionals. War is not a game and should not be “sold” as entertainment to our children.

6.
We support repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. This may sound counter-intuitive, but it obviously isn’t working. It is our opinion that “Gun-Free Zones” anywhere are too tempting of an environment for the mentally disturbed individual to inflict their brand of horror with little fear of interference. While governmental and non-governmental organizations, businesses, and individuals should be free to implement a Gun-Free Zone if they so choose, they should also assume Tort liability for that decision.

7.
We believe that border states should take responsibility for implementation of border control laws to prevent illegal shipments of firearms and drugs. Drugs have been illegal in this country for a long, long time yet the Federal Government manages to seize only an estimated 10% of this contraband at our borders. Given this dismal performance record that is misguided and inept (“Fast and Furious”), we believe that border States will be far more competent at this mission.

8.
This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate that responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our principles and act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.

The undersigned Quiet Professionals hereby humbly stand ever present, ever ready, and ever vigilant.

---END---

1100 Green Berets Signed the above Letter

Stolen Valor has list of all their names and unlike any MSM outlets can confirm that over 1100 Green Berets did sign. The list includes Special Forces Major Generals & Special Forces Command Sergeants Major down to the lowest ranking “Green Beret”.

The letter stands for itself.

Read it and send it everywhere.